Monkeysphere of Healthcare
Have you heard of the monkey-sphere? Researchers studied why primates band into societies of certain sizes. They were unable to develop a cohesive hypothesis for this phenomenon until they compared brain sizes. Different primate species with similar brain size had societies with similar numbers of members - the smaller the brain, the smaller the society. The results allowed scientists to develop a mathematical formula that would accurately predict the size of the primates’ social network.
When the formula was applied to humans, it revealed that humans develop social networks of up to 150. In other words, we conceptualize up to 150 people as personally human enough to deserve of empathy. This explains why people are indifferent towards others who are not in their network – why we are more concerned with our family pet than with the well-being of our garbage collector.
Political parties play off this research. They know individuals will not be overtly concerned with such things as the economy or access to affordable healthcare until members within the individual’s close-knit network is negatively impacted.
With an average of 2.75 persons per household, and 111,175,000 households in the US; approximately 2,025,000 households must be impacted before our political leaders will attempt to correct a problem.
The US population was estimated to be 304,059,724 in 2008. Approximately 18% of the population is without health insurance; and since families rarely insure only half the family, then 19,902,091 households do not have health insurance. Most people are relatively healthy. Even at a 10% illness rate, only 1.9 million households are negatively impacted by the lack of affordable healthcare. When current programs care for one-third of the uninsured, then 1.3 million households are actually suffering the negative affects of no health insurance.
We are slowly moving towards the breakpoint for a serious public outcry, which explains why politicians are showing concern. But, we are more than a half million households from any serious public outcry, which explains why politicians are still giving their greatest concern to big donor corporations.